Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening
From:	"Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date:	Wed, 5 Jan 2011 23:28:53 -0000
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1294270153; bh=jHQ1f+zyHvJvk8ag99lRr+e7lPxZNH5Gr4+kQeRA2Qg=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=pNSxbsw/+uiSPehesGrhhbHjDM2kP53H9284V5QapWMDKKmcI2mkjLr1Ld0gj4BuJXWwaszfk6vk41njR0S0gIKROiyBKYb3RdlbbTYO1MVVHuLSwCT8BBEabtVnrkJ3XjEiti2YW0MGX4FDQ6SnWHOSBiXXQhW360UzMV/+4UQ=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=ofb1ILtpLs+4+PF3SPlBuOx0aWG3sXl1wVmfN+r7RGDk3LW0n7ODAWjnNt5Jm5PhATIL2HtsY/MoOQHwkppm59rrfezPXR6VwIJiIk5iY9Zr1Oxm4OFVrqCdVGmlYhIdam4bEd1VIL6daRRI0Czw6BjbAAESCc55zRr+JyvVT5I= ;
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Yes that is what my aerial measurements said as well in rain....increased
loss resistance.....not sure though whether it is a ground effect or the
film of water on the wire.

Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening


> No - no changes at all.
>
> The only difference is that it is raining now.which - by the way these
> things work - has *increased* the antenna resistance and reduced power
> output by a dB or two.
>
> Andy
> 'JNT / 'IMR
>
>
>
> On 5 January 2011 14:53, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > Your 136kHz WSPR beacon is coming in very well today at around -6/-7dB
S/N
> > at 188km. Have you made some further ERP improvements?  PA0A is also a
very
> > good signal too.
> >
> > I hope to be TXing on 136kHz WSPR this evening ....but with a rather
weaker
> > signal than these two. Any reports (at all) would be very much
appreciated.
> >
> > 73s
> > Roger G3XBM
> > --
> > g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
> > www.g3xbm.co.uk
> > www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
> > <http://vlf_grabber/>G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088
> >
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening, Roger Lapthorn Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening, Andy Talbot Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening, Alan Melia <= Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening, Andy Talbot Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening, Alan Melia

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: 137kHz WSPR - reports appreciated [maybe...] correction, Roger Lapthorn
Next by Date:	Re: LF: 137kHz WSPR - reports appreciated [maybe...] correction, Martin Evans
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening, Andy Talbot
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening, Andy Talbot
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]