Hi Peter I am quite willing to accept the toad side but the VLF part looks
at first scan through to be complete rubbish, either misunderstood or
misquioted. The first comment that signals are more stable at night than in
the daytime is just totally wrong and the reverse of the truth. There is
evidence for ionospheric pertubations but it is sparse and not very
reproducible. There needs to be an investigation of ionospheric changes
where EQs didn't occur as well as the coincidental evaluation after the
event. Well I suppose they are biologists. The problem with EQ precursors is
that most experimentnting there WANT to get a positive result, which doesnt
always lead to a critical analysis of the data. I dont knock it, because if
a system can be derived it will save many thousands of lives.

Thanks for the post I hadn't seen that one.

Alan G3NYK


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "M0FMT" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 12:51 PM
Subject: LF: What has VLF to do with Toads & Earth Quakes ?



http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Environment/documents/2010/03/30/toads.pdf

73 es Bufo Bufo ..... GL petefmt


I support www.NotSpotTelecom.Com your community Telco / ISP.