Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: VLF Earth Mode does NOT need an NoV - official at last

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: VLF Earth Mode does NOT need an NoV - official at last
From: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 16:10:02 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=yUQvQELUX/uJH+/Grtymz5asnG1lCvwdZ90UUETFhEA=; b=rdwAB8xjQHDGhQPYC8hurhpfel/7S6v2WY/VvyVLDY+9y69ZbskOGdaORmGpYRyimS 7PkhceKXX6WtzYR84NML7w57vLn/f+gg4HEjZfj7TShVEleAH4kHqgNXlSAykSt/onwL 9TMlVZ7yynTrhW3VIPQ1wT6RNY+EpXoAs8z3M=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=AlgL50sPDJSSQyGQfPyAp67jCFMx5Mmb/u62UPXyoMiL4Brdm9ssvV9eXxYnsHRgf2 q5nbBe1Lfvqsr7c/JniNQVJkglPwJI2YV16+dII6Bh4/+5yyNUiwq1558YlcRC0dgB6L dUtlHjnpAEEJ5lpwSkKF5amciru0tF0uZvhFc=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Which raises the issue of the antennas for ULF Submarine comms.   Could it be said that feeders of hundreds of km length terminated to ground at the far end are used solely to get a wide spacing in the ground with the feed itself not contributing to the radiation.    In which case the resulting ground mode comms must pass right though the earth - including its iron core.  No, perhaps not.
 
But it makes you think - when does earth mode - non-licensable -  become radiative from the loop of feeder and ground return path?
 
Andy
 


 
On 18 January 2011 15:44, Chris Trayner <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Roger,

On 2011 Jan 18, at 15:11, Roger Lapthorn wrote:

> Today I received this letter from OFCOM, which clarifies the legality of operating so called "earth mode" (conduction/induction via the ground) experiments at frequencies below 9kHz in the UK. Note the sentence in Paul's letter saying, "We would not normally issue NoVs for communications using non-wireless telegraphy apparatus/stations i.e.  where you rely only on conducted emissions and where there are no intentional radiated emissions.".

Maybe.

Saying that they don't normally issue NoVs could mean that NoVs aren't needed, or that they are needed but that OFCOM would rarely grant one.

I suspect that their intended interpretation is what you say, and that they simply haven't written it unambiguously. I'm willing to say this in your defence in court ;-)

73,
Chris G4OKW

-----------------------
Dr Chris Trayner
School of Electronic & Electrical Engineering,
The University of Leeds,
Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 113 34 32053
Fax: +44 113 34 32032






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>