I assumed he used the ex Madridrdo equipment.
Very strong tx but bad listener, or should we have called him just after
his traffic list.?
CQ is in fact not wrong, but would be better to use a serie of V's or
text stating test or beacon.
Now the first trigger is to call him.
On the other end, possible he didn't expect that his transmission could
have this range and didn't bother to check his receiver.
If he is working with 5W he certainly put a nice sig here at QRB1500Km
I clocked him with 549 on a miniwhip at the end of his transmission.
Location JO21it,
I'm x-tal fixed on 502,3 so it was in way useless to call him
transmitting on 503 providing he listens with a small filter.
Jan/pa3abk
Op 23-11-2010 22:04, John Rabson schreef:
Was he perhaps following coast station procedure and sending CQ _not_followed
by K because he was not expecting a reply?
Any ex ROs care to comment?
John F5VLF
On 23 Nov 2010, at 20:38CET, Rik Strobbe wrote:
|
