He was sending K in fact repeated 3 times
K K K
Rik om immature and incorrect procedure as observed also by others, your
observations are incorrect.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Rabson" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: EA4BVZ
Was he perhaps following coast station procedure and sending CQ
_not_followed by K because he was not expecting a reply?
Any ex ROs care to comment?
On 23 Nov 2010, at 20:38CET, Rik Strobbe wrote:
> I could also copy EA4BVZ also 539 with a lot of QSB.
> He seemed just to do some test transmissions, what unfortunately provoked
some rather immature reactions.
> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
> Van: [email protected]
[[email protected]] namens L.v.Erck [[email protected]]
> Verzonden: dinsdag 23 november 2010 20:21
> Aan: [email protected]
> Onderwerp: LF: Re: EA4BVZ
> MAL RFECEIVED HIM S3 HERE AT JO21NJ. GOOD LUCK WKNG HIM......!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: mal hamilton
> To: rsgb
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 7:38 PM
> Subject: LF: EA4BVZ
> EAA4BVZ nw cq on 503 but not listening, leaving no gap for a reply
> de mal/g3kev