| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: looking for a simple-to-build sub-9KHz E-probe |
| From: | Daniele Tincani <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 3 Oct 2010 08:30:49 -0700 (PDT) |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1286119849; bh=MG9caW0aEjN3y/fSIc4sT+zcjQVhVNqtA4HyRcdOvVk=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=B093qvjN2hVEfkr+nfmuxoi73lGPxVntEEGyrrX2U8rNu3nsqlotTxNOsIgLvIEBBLYZI06xssZc+pgdcLxHib5D8imxlisTS4KVVDLW0w0poKnAWeDQ+Tf9uwtLEUt2gAd/+oR7W7DwVHbJYTdDGBF9BvBlwc0Lw9xnG2bXnw0= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NSHKbfuUQPtJbIzTsEHKbO9BnwwrxSDABF9kgKek3AfE6C4xhKMsrAxNOquyyyqe7/C4GhDA5C0jQ5TducqxQS8N0e3c8JqMDYDQxZbn+5fMEE4vr+oCH0NiRdR2sDkAJRJ76b72UMMNzgETCmf5BhROY7LqmOGHRsfW7nGa/Kc=; |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
Hi Jim,
I knew about your design, but after the explanation in your attached e-mail the differences w.r.t. the pre-amp I'm currently using.are much more clear. It looks like something I could try to build, even without rebuilding the loop.
Cheers Daniele |
| Previous by Date: | LF: 500 Kcs, mal hamilton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: WSPR from G8IMR, John RABSON |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: looking for a simple-to-build sub-9KHz E-probe, James Moritz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: looking for a simple-to-build sub-9KHz E-probe, James Moritz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |