Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: F4DTL to ON7YD

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: F4DTL to ON7YD
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:49:09 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
Hello Nicolas,

With a higher diameter you get more L at less turns, so more volts per turn. This makes it necessary to use a better wire insulation or a higher wire spacing, depending on the power. Keeping the coil dry is important, no matter what wire you use. Thus i have to go immediately QRT on VLF when it starts to rain. On LF, it is enough just to cover the coil by a trash bag...

73 and GL, Stefan/DK7FC



Am 17.10.2010 00:36, schrieb [email protected]:
Hello Rik,LF
 
Because I had this diameter in PVC and especially to limit the losses in the coil.Less length of wire and of course a better Q factor.Unfortunately this afternoon I wanted to increase the power for a last test to 430W,it was raining and there is an spark between two coils and a beautiful burns.Too much voltage can be a problem or isolation of wires? I will repair it with news tests. I did not know that these diameters are more vulnerable to losses in nearby object. Thanx for this information.
 
If you want some pictures give your personal email Rick.
 
F4DTL Nicolas JN18FP
 
 
 
Dans un e-mail daté du 16/10/2010 15:36:50 Paris, Madrid (heure d'été), [email protected] a écrit :
Hello Nicolas,
 
is there any particular reason you made a large diameter loading coil ?
I recall a discussion (maybe 10 years ago) on this reflector where the outcome was that large diameter coils (to a certain extend) have a better Q, but are also more vulnerable to losses in nearby object.
 
73, Rik  ON7YD  
 
 
 
 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>