| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: G8IMR WSPR LF |
| From: | John P-G <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:47:17 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| Organization: | The Gammy Bird |
| References: | <[email protected]> <20101003152742.680b7b5a@opc1> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:36:45 +0100 Andy Talbot <[email protected]> wrote: > It is in absolute terms, I think. > > But bearing in mind it is 10dB up in power , and best DX previously > was 368km, then its just about the same assuming inverse square law > applies :-( Well, I'd guess that the inverse square law might need modifying to include excess losses due to ground effects etc. given that the path between us is substantially overground, especially the first 2/3 of the path. Cheers, John |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: G8IMR WSPR LF, Andy Talbot |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: 500 Kcs, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: G8IMR WSPR LF, Andy Talbot |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: G8IMR WSPR LF, Andy Talbot |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |