Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: 136kHz ERP calculation

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 136kHz ERP calculation
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:01:32 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RmGbZjszhohzOv1dx+ECYLkDT7nlbY66dSO7ikfiBLE=; b=Vvuu0fguDCBGSQpIEiSZoypheSwZuWXUhc9tDqdb7XCtl2zeNBbB/C1XTXb+7T24uH qqGkFbjcjjSJ+EuMFdqnQHjBAvXQJHaGb0YAHMdO8qmeLGE051k6EZ2WsIozwQhQ0Lg/ w67qhT4a2xJndtpg575vSVLWx5965lIZbwuDs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Sybcv4p2PJfN5QqtChIUlXp1KHabMhmnalY0lIeHnqYLM0C1WWGNFiwMawDr/8uEAp +DNTrsN+AvFswy2e73J8hy5zWyYD94r4hO9t3KRxNjIvkiYDreoMAYJzyA3DEk8vbSA3 FcsNrwV6X51zTdpAcmpbnerH/STWltoq8quyQ=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <009101cb38dc$f0b119d0$4001a8c0@lark>
References: <[email protected]> <009101cb38dc$f0b119d0$4001a8c0@lark>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Alan,
 
Thanks - that's obviously the thing to do. I'll try this later today and share results here.

73s

Roger G3XBM

On 10 August 2010 23:39, Alan Melia <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Roger you can calibrate your loop first using DCF39 on 138.83. This has a
field strength in our area of 1mV/m. Then you could work back your own ERP
by comparison...... 1W ERP produces 300mV/m at 1km, 100mV/m at 10km (from
memory ....I think that is correct....10dB per decade after 1km).  Doing it
that way removes as lot of the variables, and its a good thumbnail
calculation.

Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Lapthorn" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 7:09 PM
Subject: LF: 136kHz ERP calculation


> *My last post didn't appear, so this is a retry...*
>
> About a week ago I recorded my 136kHz QRP beacon (2W from PA, QRSS3, using
> just 20m separated earth electrodes as the antenna) at 14.9km away from
the
> QTH using Spectran with a 30t, 80cm loop, Hi-Z matching into the FT817.
>
> I'm wondering if someone here is able to *work out the ERP* that I must be
> achieving please. These are the numbers I have:
>
> Spectran signal level     -42.5dB
> Resolution                    0.17Hz
> Sampling rate                11025
> Distance (Rx from TX)    14.9km
>
> It surprises me that the signal can be seen so well at this distance with
> such low power and with this "antenna" set-up.  Thanks in advance for any
> help and please excuse my ignorance.
>
> 73s
> Roger G3XBM
>
> --
> http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
> http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
> http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
> G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088
>





--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>