To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: TA DX on the dreamers band? |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:26:57 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1278606547; bh=pGWRR0zErHdadYf7fEjg9PFZP6hdLeICW/VPtPrvAyI=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=fNDsm5E3vhDIryHZ7OwjThBx1IyRJHR4oyGE5ByAvTu/cmwo/0UI+M6IAnSFuogMCyBOapz8P1vQq212HsgP+f4FuVTWMArslBo3OqKQaiktSQtejN0MpYM8bKaKrVzx2/2Rod7Fdm6uGWOhZUc9hqN0EqnMDGzhGuF2ysS3dvo= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=t6oDMxiZqSkR6LQUBLNSpT7kPokmkFZISd2axKVmoywK7QMgTu4jXH29uCXMZEeE/XCj13L/0+DUbMipYwIvB9UvNjU+8EjveIuTa6AWWCewSH6QvThfyzZEPnwYmaEn+LFoFhVxqqNb0OnqgVDgPrSAx1Tmb6PDIqlhj9jtnuY= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <[email protected]> <002301cb1e8c$d28d4740$4001a8c0@lark> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Stefan, Mmmm I suppose I put my head right into the noose there :-)) I think this is a difficult one. I am sure the ideal time would be just before sunset in Canada or just before dawn in Europe. That is not much of a help as flying kites at those times is not really feasible :-)) Thinking more generally I would say the best time in a daylight path might be mid-day at mid path.....but that is only a "gut feeling". But in daytime, summer might be better for daytime propagation than winter (not allowing for seasonal noise variation) ......I'm ducking and diving and hedging by bets :-)) It could be Paul's waveguide propagation equations would give helpful answers. If only to calculate the approximate signal levels to compare with the previous tests. Its 4 times further that suggest 16 times the ERP or "capability" of the system. Hopefully if the VLF effect helps it might only need be nearer to 6 to 8dB. There may also be a limitation to how narrow a bandwidth you can use on reception on a path of this length. I am watching with interest, this is quite a new area, and you can't beat experimentation. If that don't fit the theory..... you have to devise a new theory ....not junk the measurements, because you cant argue with measurement. Best Wishes Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 1:23 PM Subject: VLF: TA DX on the dreamers band? > Alan, > > Which time (UTC) would be your recommendation for trying a transatlantic > DX reception on 9 kHz, say to canada? > Any ideas? > > Other experts are asked as well here! > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re: QRN, Alan Melia |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: TA DX on the dreamers band?, Warren Ziegler |
Previous by Thread: | VLF: TA DX on the dreamers band?, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: TA DX on the dreamers band?, Warren Ziegler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |