Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: 136kHz LPF toroids?

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: 136kHz LPF toroids?
From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:01:55 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1280095321; bh=6zCG6MF6qcqQGxoQlCvi2krgZE1T2Rq4JWRIyZF4RVY=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=b6NB915x980tIghXp8Vw6OqAT4vxUR8QfKMpsJ/F+3dA297cyqKO+8wWAfQVVIeD6bvbAHEdobgzcvEfLIoHJ+0uYcEjQ4l+y7JTOxiAo8MZ9mRqoFy8l8lwK+s/VSZhXd/x0wVz2+HTJcZ4oeZVU/g7ouI/vDuiY9oL3Ew7Ljk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=QndAfoRQvWa74xQ0ZRViAOFhlsz7xK9RJ4PgeFF52QDlvZmlaYgHG0atntiVHDjiAmpPceHgeQw+g8IHg391tAiYANXkxBpA2lMbKm37rHTuqbHfSaj+6dSp4HDFLAyCbT+DlDGjOBiLrMzxHLEgL+VQOZYZcbnPH8j3tpDaqyE= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Dear Roger, LF Group,

I used T-130-2 toroid cores (with 63 turns) in the output filter of my 200W PA, which proved to be quite conservative for this power level. T-200-2 cores have proved adequate at 1kW output. The main limitation to using smaller cores for low powers is that the required number of turns increases - this means either finer wire or multi-layer winding. Fine wire will reduce Q , multi-layer windings increase stray C, which reduces supression of higher-order harmonics. How important these are depends on the type of PA design you intend to use. But I would guess the T-94 or T-106 size toroids should be fine at the 20W level at 136k, and are not particularly bulky compared to other components likely to be in the design. The #2 material seems to be the best widely available choice for this job.

Pot core inductors, or other kinds of ferrite core, are quite feasible, but need to be designed with an air gap to get a reasonably high Q and stable inductance, which complicates things a bit.

Air-cored inductors are quite feasible too, but require quite a large diameter, say around 50mm, and spacing from other components, so would probably be quite bulky for a 20W TX.

For receiver input filters I have mostly used fixed inductors of the type manufactured as filter chokes. For example the Panasonic "ELC" series sold by RS components that are small ferrite bobbins with an open winding usually have a reasonable Q of about 50 - 100 at 136k. It isn't too hard to change the inductance by removing some turns, or to add a link winding if required. The fixed inductors that look like resistors are rather low Q at LF for tuned circuits, however. Bear in mind these inductors are not screened.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>