To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: QSO |
From: | Mike-WE0H <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:59:55 -0500 |
In-reply-to: | <007601cb2dc8$df5d8bb0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
References: | <005601cb2dbf$c836d030$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <007601cb2dc8$df5d8bb0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) |
Maybe everyone is getting bored with TA signal reports every night. I mean, how many times do you have to cross the pond to get excited? Woohoo!!! I find these Earth Antennas interesting reading. Who cares if someone with a 4kw amp can make his signal cross the pond on any band. Boring.... Mike-WE0H mal wrote: How could going backwards be Positive !!!! Check the records for years gone by on 137 and look at what is happening today. I am but pointing out the facts, has no one learnt anything from information published over the past several years. I was getting 579 reports from NC1K years ago on 137 but today it seems to be a struggle for some to be heard a few hundred metres awayProve me wrong ? g3kev*From: Roger LWonderful Mal. Do you never have ANYTHING positive to say? . 73s Roger G3XBM On 27 July 2010 20:13, mal wrote: There is no need for QRS around EU. In the past all EU was worked on CW and daytime over 1000 miles plus on 137 kcs Maybe QRS for N America/China and further afield. QRS around EU is a backward step and certainly not progress, and earthed antennas !!! Need I say more? g3kev |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: XGJ 28-07.jpg, henny van elst |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: FRARS Hamfest 2010, Andy Talbot |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: QSO, mal hamilton |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: QSO, Chris |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |