To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Re: QSO |
From: | "Chris" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:01:13 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1280311273; bh=xSeVtUJ6lJLXY7o7kZdmdwi6acNkilDGEW0XTrNXYJE=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=KaHROHIqWwDs34Ivd9J5dIopLkemMBEq+imBIYLImc+P4uslwj+t/X0CxPRnk1l65oJAyocaVO1AGk+tIeMgO8xIt/XdLszX6c/0wuhsv0lDswg84Dv2FP/nzkHqpx2cLKZOlO+k6Lapmo9VYySU0gvJlIjE3S9lNYa4xSJgHuY= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=yy0NJMfgGikEOUDlHhmCOce6rGzp7NOrDtCsGHB1CEIH3Yzv1ADTzr+FO4cs8OsX8at/eLKA32hEkFYSHgqVoJOmJyFo4l6Mkp5hgNA3gS3bTmQDKyMkXKkQohx5K6eHdqEgV7c1klyz4+S1W/HHGvY72ZxnovqEK8tJbBQID8E= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <005601cb2dbf$c836d030$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <007601cb2dc8$df5d8bb0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Well, I am afraid I find it quite exciting still! I was delighted to find a trace of XGJ on my overnight captures this morning. I was playing with earth systems best part of 50 years ago. I have to say I agree with Mal, use a proper antenna and operate at a sensible frequency!! Your comments are somewhat disheartening for those of us still learning. Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT.----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike-WE0H" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 9:59 AM Subject: LF: Re: QSO Maybe everyone is getting bored with TA signal reports every night. I mean, how many times do you have to cross the pond to get excited? Woohoo!!!I find these Earth Antennas interesting reading. Who cares if someone with a 4kw amp can make his signal cross the pond on any band. Boring....Mike-WE0H mal wrote:How could going backwards be Positive !!!! Check the records for years gone by on 137 and look at what is happening today. I am but pointing out the facts, has no one learnt anything from information published over the past several years. I was getting 579 reports from NC1K years ago on 137 but today it seems to be a struggle for some to be heard a few hundred metres awayProve me wrong ? g3kev *From: Roger L Wonderful Mal. Do you never have ANYTHING positive to say? . 73s Roger G3XBMOn 27 July 2010 20:13, mal wrote: There is no need for QRS around EU. In the past all EU was worked on CW and daytime over 1000 miles plus on 137 kcs Maybe QRS for N America/China and further afield. QRS around EU is a backward step and certainly not progress, and earthed antennas !!! Need I say more? g3kev |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: FRARS Hamfest 2010, Andy Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: 137kHz XGJ, Y & 5, Gary - G4WGT |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: QSO, Mike-WE0H |
Next by Thread: | VLF: GBZ, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |