Hi Roger
I did spot you 3 times tonight -28dB,
-29dB and -30dB, using my inverted L, normal TX antenna. Nothing on the
Doublet, the spots are on the database now although they didn’t get
uploaded at the time.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roger Lapthorn
Sent: 18 June 2010 22:42
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: AW: RE: Earth
electrode loop area - I'm struggling
137kHz
is a project for later this year Stefan.
73s
Roger G3XBM
2010/6/18 Stefan Schäfer
<[email protected]>
Interesting!
I wish i would know my ERP during the 9 kHz test where i reached 2km. But the
grabber is still not calibrated :-(
Roger, when will you try 137 kHz?
73 es gl
Stefan/DK7FC
________________________________
Von: [email protected]
im Auftrag von Rik Strobbe
Gesendet: Fr 18.06.2010 23:10
An: [email protected]
Betreff: LF: RE: Earth electrode loop area - I'm struggling
Hello Roger,
my pennyworth:
assuming
- 50uW ERP
- antenna is traded as a loop (gain = -0.4dBd)
Due to the negative gain (-0.4dB versus dipole) a loop antenna must
"radiate" 55uW to get 50uW ERP.
Since the antenna feeding current is 0.15A the radiation resistance is 2.44
milliOhm (R= P/I^2)
The radiation resistance of a small loop is : Ra = 320xPi^4*A^2/L^4
where A = loop area (m^2) and L = wavelength (m)
For 500kHz Ra = 5*10^(-7)*A^2 or A = 1416*sqrt(Ra)
If Ra = 0.00244 Ohm then effective the loop area is 70m^2
73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T
________________________________
Van: [email protected]
[[email protected]]
namens Roger Lapthorn [[email protected]]
Verzonden: vrijdag 18 juni 2010 22:29
Aan: [email protected]
Onderwerp: LF: Earth electrode loop area - I'm struggling
Please can someone help me with the maths? I've been trying to work out my
effective loop area and I cannot get sensible answers. These are the measured
or estimated numbers I have:
Voltage across "loop" = 24.48V rms - measured
Current flowing in "loop" = 0.15A - measured
ERP (from far field levels) = 50-100uW (may be less) based on -18dB S/N with
M0BMU
>From these figures I should be able to work out the loop area, but either my
calculations are wrong or the figure is correct and the effective loop area is
very very small.
Help!
73s
Roger G3XBM
--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
<http://www.g3xbm.co.uk/>
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088
--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088