Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

LF: Re: Re: COIL WINDING THOUGHT

from [mal hamilton] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Re: COIL WINDING THOUGHT
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:05:22 +0100
References: <003201cb070d$9e75a330$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <8503823EEAF14A7DAD78F7A61BF0210E@Hugh>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected] 
Hugh
You have nothing to fear with the sort of voltage you generate
mal/g3kev

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hugh_m0wye" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 2:57 PM
Subject: LF: Re: COIL WINDING THOUGHT


> This method of winding increases the interwinding capacitance, and also
> lowers the breakdown voltage of the overall coil, because adjascent turns
> have a higher potential between them. When I wound my loading coil, I
> deliberately used single layer winding to maximise the voltage handling.
> Hugh M0WYE
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
> To: "rsgb" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 2:22 PM
> Subject: LF: COIL WINDING THOUGHT
>
>
> A reel of 6 core insulated strands  200 metres long becomes 1200 metres a
> good reduction in winding time.
> g3kev
>
>
>
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  LF: Re: RE: COIL WINDING THOUGHT, mal hamilton
Next by Date:  LF: Re: Re: COIL WINDING THOUGHT, mal hamilton
Previous by Thread:  LF: Re: COIL WINDING THOUGHT, Hugh_m0wye
Next by Thread:  LF: Re: Re: COIL WINDING THOUGHT, mal hamilton
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]