Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: W1VLF 8.97 KHz UPDATE Trees, Questions, Ground

To: [email protected]
Subject: LF: Re: W1VLF 8.97 KHz UPDATE Trees, Questions, Ground
From: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:00:45 +0100
In-reply-to: <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C19A2156E84@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be>
References: <003201cae3db$b7ffad50$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g>, <006e01cae6e3$2d46f4b0$4001a8c0@lark>, <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102C19A2156E84@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
On 28 Apr 2010 at 17:27, Rik Strobbe wrote:

> Hi Alan,
> 
> indeed, "low voltage" loops suffer far less from these losses.
> But the radiation resistance of a loop falls with the 4th power of the
> wavelength, whereas for a vertical it is only with the 2nd power. At
> 9kHz a loop of 15m high and 40m long will have a radiation resistance of
> merely 10 nanoOhm (on 137kHz it is 0.5 milliOhm). So get out 1mW on 9kHz
> one would need to pump 330A into the antenna. Using 1cm diameter solid
> copper wire for the loop (anything less will probably act as a fuse) the
> loss resistance is at least 0.025 Ohm (just copper loss, no stray
> currents etc) and 2.5kW will be needed.
> 
> 73, Rik  ON7YD

Indeed. With all the problems I had with a small loop on 136kHz and the 
high circulating currents (20A ish at a few watts) I would imagine on 
at a 1/18th of the frequency would have an efficiency not far above 
zero....

73 Dave G3YMC

http://www.davesergeant.com



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>