Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: LF: Re: DK7FC's 3rd VLF transmission

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Re: LF: Re: DK7FC's 3rd VLF transmission
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:16:30 +0100
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: freenetMail
Hi Rik,

I prefer the SDR-IQ for VLF - it's less expensive than the Perseus, and more 
important, it goes down in frequency to "almost zero" (unlike Perseus, as 
mentioned here before). Don't get this wrong, Perseus is a superb radio too, 
but there's no easy way to bypass the input bandpass (highpass). I use Perseus 
on HF, and SDR-IQ on LF, VLF, and to listen for bats(!) .

Most soundcard's are fine too, and for the next experiment, you will be able to 
use the ALPHA signals to permanently calibrate the soundcard's frequency drift 
(when extremely high FFT resolution is required). 

Cheers,
  Wolf DL4YHF .

----- original Nachricht --------

Betreff: Re: LF: Re: DK7FC's 3rd VLF transmission
Gesendet: Mi 24 Mär 2010 09:50:19 CET
Von: "Rik Strobbe"<[email protected]>

> Hello Roelof,
> 
> thanks for the circuit diagram. It looks pretty simple.
> If I "read" the circuit diagram correct it is a buffer amplifier (the 
> voltage gain maybe even less than 1, however due to the impedance 
> transformation the power gain is huge).
> It seems a bit of overshoot to me to buy a perseus (just checked, 
> they ask 850 Euro for it), so my first option would be to go to the 
> PC soundcard.
> Do you (or others) have any experience with that ?
> 
> 73, Rik ON7YD
> 
> 
> At 19:29 23/03/2010, you wrote:
> >Hello Rick,
> >
> >Michael Oexner has had good results with a mini-whip E-field probe I build
> >for him.
> >The circuit diagram is in the attachment.
> >The feedline is CAT5 network cable.
> >
> >Note that the RF-isolating transformers in the signal path are not
> correct.
> >I have used MCL TT 1-6 parts, rated for 0.004 - 300 MHz at the -3 dB
> >points.
> >The common mode chokes are not optimum, as I used the parts I had on hand.
> >Type 75 or 77 ferrite should be better.
> >
> >Michael used a PERSEUS SDR, which has a noise figure of about 25 dB at 9
> >kHz.
> >This is due to the fact that there is also a RF-isolating transformer in
> >the signal path.
> >
> >It is amazing that with this not optimized set up it was possible to have
> >good reception over a 72 km path.
> >The actual capture area of the antenna is 30 x 40 mm single sided copper
> >clad PCB.
> >
> >There are quite a few people around with a PERSEUS SDR, who are probably
> >interested in receiving Stefan's signal.
> >So a simple antenna design might help.
> >
> >I have the parts for an optical link active E-field antenna, as suggested
> >by Stefan.
> >Due to other more pressing matters, I have not yet put them to good use.
> >
> >I hope this helps,
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Roelof, pa0rdt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 

--- original Nachricht Ende ----




Gratis: Jeden Monat 3 SMS versenden-
Mit freenetMail - Ihrer kostenlose E-Mail-Adresse
http://email.freenet.de/dienste/emailoffice/produktuebersicht/basic/sms/index.html?pid=6830


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>