To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: WPF |
From: | "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 28 Feb 2010 13:55:29 -0000 |
In-reply-to: | <AE40935B3EC94D40AFFC78CFC5FD3733@Black> |
References: | <[email protected]>, <AE40935B3EC94D40AFFC78CFC5FD3733@Black> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
It would certainly encourage Eu DX activity if there were more distant grabbers monitoring the Eu waterhole around 136.320kHz. It is also a pity that W3EEE's excellent DCF39 monitor seems to be QRT now. If all of the grabbers monitor the 137.77kHz slot it is very tempting for Eu DXers to use that frequency and cause QRM to those checking for US / Asia DX. Mike, G3XDV ========== > I have tried to convince Ossi to avoid extended beacon transmissions > in or near the "TA waterhole". He would be willing to move to the "Eu > slot", if only there were more active grabbers, also from the American > side. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: 9kHz noise level, Markus Vester |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: 9kHz noise level, Alexander S. Yurkov |
Previous by Thread: | LF: WPF, Lubos OK2BVG |
Next by Thread: | LF: 9kHz/Mini Whip, Ken |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |