To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 500 kHz JT4A |
From: | "James Moritz" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:00:31 -0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=L5nP950C3eijh7/0fPqU8knxR+vgztQsD+ABJlzHlfrbDfNunhB7poBzr27wwLGzQoixH6ZfXCIVQnEWYpKS3VMHIE5VAhOlvoKfnd3h50gMerUAFYGscqeSMHdKCrPJfeQR5UBo7MKPGoAfoa4+ajA9mhuSbh0BIcwMghgvFjg= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dear Gary, LF Group,----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary - G4WGT" <[email protected]> Jim, LF, Is it a 1st for UK 500 kHz WSJT JT4A 2 way contact ?? Well, I'm not sure - one kind of loses track after a while ;-) Thanks for the QSO, Gary. JT4A actually seems to work quite well for a rubber-stamp type of QSO on 500kHz. There were several deep fades during Gary's transmissions where the signal disappeared from the spectrogram. However, all overs decoded successfully here too. I have left my TX running transmitting test calls in JT4A mode on about 503.47kHz for a while if anyone else would like to have a look. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 500 kHz JT4A, Andy Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 500 kHz JT4A, Rik Strobbe |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 500 kHz JT4A, Andy Talbot |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 500 kHz JT4A, James Moritz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |