Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: ERP<>EMRP

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: ERP<>EMRP
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:39:04 +0100
References: <[email protected]><007501ca9acc$e78e29a0$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: Acqa0Fq5w+pUi4DKSW+jf170wx7dfQAIo/tE
Thread-topic: ERP<>EMRP
Hi Andy, 
 
Isn't it, the ERP is I^2*Rrad*1,83, if we assume a vertical antenna?
 
73, Stefan

________________________________

Von: [email protected] im Auftrag von Andy Talbot
Gesendet: Do 21.01.2010 20:27
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: LF: Re: M0BMU - any chance of some new ERP estimates please?


So go on:  argue against the Rrad (an exact figure derived from basic 
electromag theory) and Rloss (easily measurable, called Ohms law) way of 
getting antenna efficiency.   
 
Or  ERP =   I^2 . Rrad   where I is measurable.
 
Only uncertainty in any of these techniques is the effective height of the 
antenna used to get Rrad, but absolute worst case, can only ever lead to 6dB 
error.  The difference between no top hat and an infinite top hat

Andy
www.g4jnt.com <http://www.g4jnt.com/> 


<<winmail.dat>>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>