Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: "Gain" between qrss3 and qrss10?
From: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:57:37 +0100
Organization: http://freemail.web.de/
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Dear all,


> Von: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]>

> If the "gain" or better said SNR between qrss30 and qrss3 is 10dB, so 
> can I do a QSO to VK with 1W TX Power and an antenna efficiency of 1/
> 1000 if I choose QRSS10000000000? That?s a litte jokingly 
> formulated but you know what I mean. In other words, where are the 
> limitations of this rule? 

The variability of the channel properties and your life expectancy  (hi)

...

> What is the maximum power that is applied to an antenna yet? What 
> have you heard yet? I have applied 1kW in a bad antenna (=> abt 100mW 
> ERP), so 10kW would be possible when considering to stay in the legal 
> limit. 10kW would be possible since one doesn't need a ferrite core 
> that has to keep the power (in Class E mode). In USA it would be even 
> more easy due to the fact that the 110V of the mains could just be 
> rectified. Then I would take some STW12NK90Zin parallel and a 
> IXDD414and try it with 15A antenna current ;-)
> Sorry, but in that hobby it is really easy to become euphoric?

You've nicely demonstrated the nonsense of the 1W ERP legal limit regs.
The 200 W TX output on LF and 100 W TX output on MF the norwegian
authorities permitted seem to be by far more reasonable to me.

73
Joerg, DL3NRV






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>