Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Intercontinental LF waterholes

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Intercontinental LF waterholes
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:30:24 -0500
References: <BC520BF69FBC4F4B9B8E1C9B8AAB8A9B@White>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Marcus, T/A enthusiasts
 
Thanks for bringing this issue up for discussion - hope you get a better response than I did last year ;~)
 
In the northeast USA it is impossible to monitor the 'high' waterhole for T/A when either XGJ or XES is on the air. The problem cannot be fixed with directional receiving antennas. In previous years I did quite a bit of T/A reception work but now rarely even take a look at the 'high' watering hole. 
 
Not attempting to police the band but merely point out the situation. If stations return to the 'low' watering hole I will certainly listen (watch).
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2
 
    
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 6:14 PM
Subject: LF: Intercontinental LF waterholes

Dear LF group,
 
recently we find the "transatlantic waterhole" around 137.777 kHz quite busy. Several Europeans have started beaconing within this segment. And there has been some fast (QRSS3 or 10) activity, with wide traces covering up possible transatlantic DX signalling frequencies.
 
During the last years, we have attempted to split the frequency bands for both directions of transatlantic work. Traditional segments were around 137.777 kHz west-to-east (for Americans transmitting towards Eu), and around 136.320 kHz east-west (for Eu to stateside). Slow modes (QRSS or DFCW, 60 second and longer) were used almost exclusively there, and several stations were able to successfully cross the pond in either direction.
 
The situation has become a little more intricate as more stations from other parts of the world (eg. Asia, China, Japan) are joining the game with sensitive receivers and good signals. But I still think it would be helpful to separate RX and TX bands within each area as much as possible.
 
My suggestion would be to stick with the east-west versus west-east allocation of the two slots. Taking into account the path of mutual darkness, this would mean that all stations should transmit in the lower band during their evenings until local midnight, and then QSY to the lower band for the rest of the night. Receiver settings would of course be vice versa.
 
I'm aware that this scheme cannot be perfect and universal. It won't cover North-South hauls, and would not protect signals during early or late openings. But it's simple enough, and I believe it would still be very useful. Please don't get me wrong - I do not want to discourage anyone from putting out a signal, and certainly reject the notion of anything reminiscent of a "band police". I just think a little coordination may help all of us to be successful on this challenging and fascinating band.
 
Let me have your thoughts...
 
73 de Markus, DF6NM
 
 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>