Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: RE: rtty test

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: RE: LF: RE: rtty test
From: Rik Strobbe <rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 14:14:35 +0200
In-reply-to: <005d01c9cd6b$620ddc00$6401a8c0@asus>
References: <200904031959.n33Jxrvn028438@smtpa1.mediabeam.com> <BLU146-W15B01E5C9585C664E3CD90CF890@phx.gbl> <20090504220936.59jcwemhlo004wkk@webmail4.kuleuven.be> <01a401c9ccfd$f04e8640$6401a8c0@asus> <20090504233650.cpq3ip6kir688ogo@webmail4.kuleuven.be> <005d01c9cd6b$620ddc00$6401a8c0@asus>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Hello Gary,

I had a closer look at the 23Hz shift option of MMTTY and it seems to run at 45Bd what is on the edge regarding the shift/baudrate ratio. That is most likely the reason why it is not so robust.
Using 45Bd at 85Hz shift would exceed the 100Hz bandwidth limit.
I guess the best option for RTTY would be a shift around 50Hz and a lower baudrate (say 20Bd) what would well fit within the 100Hz bandwidth and would have a sufficient shift/baudrate ratio to provide a robust signal. I will see if I can get such signal out of MMTTY and - if time permits - run some tests tonight.
73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

At 12:22 5/05/2009, you wrote:
Hi Rik,

You have experienced the same as I did with 23Hz shift, the signal needs to
be very strong to decode. It was in the last 2 minutes that I got the
partial decode.

A much better shift to use is the 85Hz which will fit into your spec.

I have had good QSO's with Chris G3XIZ in Biggleswade both of us using 85Hz.

Give that a try next time & I believe I will get a much better decode
judging by the strength of your signal.

73

Gary - G4WGT.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Rik Strobbe
Sent: 04 May 2009 22:37
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: RE: rtty test

Hello Gary,

call the is almost right, locator completely.
But not really impressive for 500mW ERP.
I could see my signal on your grabber, some slow QSB but strong for
the last 2 minutes or so.
I used MTTY with the profile "23Hz RTTY (MTTY)" without any further
changes, not sure that this is the best mode.
So any advice is welcome.
I have also installed MultiPSK, but am still overwhelmed by the colors
and options.
I am allowed to use any digital mode as long as I stick to max. 100Hz
bandwidth.

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T



Quoting Gary - G4WGT <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>:

> Hi Rik,
>
> This is the best I could do, it looks like almost your call sign & locator
> :-
>
> RHTQHTST DE TC(TIOJ7T OR1T JO20IX
>
> 73
>
> Gary - G4WGT.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Rik Strobbe
> Sent: 04 May 2009 21:10
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: LF: rtty test
>
> dear all,
>
> I will run a short (10 minute) rtty test (23Hz shift) on 503.500 at 21UTC
> Reports and/or reply welcome.
>
> 73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>