Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Ultra pico-low-power WSPR beacon

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Ultra pico-low-power WSPR beacon
From: "dave.riley3" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 17:00:24 -0500
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

AA1A QSW UK WSPR QRSS window 503.900 +/-

Last night saw strong CW beacon on 503.950 separated by long dash but was not able to copy ID by ear...

TNX


----- Original Message ----- From: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Ultra pico-low-power WSPR beacon


Andy,

I am monitoring and uploading eventual spots.
I will leave the RX / PC on overnight, so whoever want to give it a try ...

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

Quoting Andy Talbot <[email protected]>:

Just for a bit of novelty, I'm running probably the lowest power WSPR
signal seen on this band.   Frequency 503.87kHz (set the usual USB
carrier 502.4) RF power is -2dBm, so ERP is in the region of -27dBm.
Duty cycle 33% (well, actually, 34.375%, but who's counting)

Judging by some of the WSPR reports on my signal when runing 100 Watts
in the past, a few local stations may just be able to decode it.

As for PN sequences, I admited defeat and just wrote down a series of
ones and zeros then played with them till they looked right and had
the correct numbers of each in a  32 bit pattern (which is why 33% and
20% duty cycle values aren't spot-on)
On the assumptuin that its not random at all, why try to generate
other than by eye?

Interesting to know Joe had a similar headache over this issue, Scott.
 Clearly it isn't a 'mountain out of a molehill' problem after all.


Andy  G4JNT
www.g4jnt.com





Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>