Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: DominoEX and FEC

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: DominoEX and FEC
From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:23:43 -0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=yVZ6Y0oakwbhqc44WM+hgfl34JzT8H/SNWWCF0GTA+fe1RsNlw1DxoKHyK28qSOYEWuubfJKfHdKCF17r9ATplsh+uFgLkDdC6t0KZ1W8FTqevYPKat8v4dR1ngelc2Qs9/et64izj7pqSv7WwAd3Pt/qcRGxWy4g/ImT470+9I= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <232F9AD021FE40A98CE6527B4DA482B5@AGB>
References: <[email protected]> <5ADF9C3861D84576BE1EF01D07F6D67D@AGB> <232F9AD021FE40A98CE6527B4DA482B5@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Dear Graham, LF Group,

Quite interesting to watch the two modes (BTW, the continuous text gives a much better comparison, thanks). At present, signal strength has improved a lot, and both signals are clearly audible between fades, which are 20dB or more (see attachment). When near maximum, both modes print almost 100%; the FEC version corrects the occasional error due to static cracks and pops, so has fewer errors, but throughput is only half. When there are bigger crashes, errors appear in the FEC copy as well, and it seems to take longer for FEC to "recover", so there are also more gaps in the copy, although probably less actual printed errors. It also seems to take longer for the FEC mode to recover after a deep fade. So the FEC does something, but in this implementation, not really what you want... I suspect it would be more advantageous to go to the narrower-band Domino EX4 sub-mode rather than use the FEC.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU



Attachment: 2_dominos.jpg
Description: JPEG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>