Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: wspr more

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Re: wspr more
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:44:45 -0000
References: <018d01c97fed$06485470$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <776A9E6582794F82A26072B3E5FF2751@JimPC>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

I just set the rx to 502.4 so not sure what your actual qrg was.
and got tx details in IO91. Your signal was vy strong and audible, all other signals had solid traces. No one has answered my question, about why these signals do not always decode and produce a print display, in spite of the fact the signals are strrong. I keep the rx threshold to the recommended 0 to 1 db input. I am checking wspr trace intensity against a decode and I am still of the opinion had the trace been keyed at qrs 3 speed or is some cases normal CW a message could have been passed more quickly. Is lack of decode a TX problem or RX problem ie soundcard or software at either end. Observations from others are similar to mine.
mal/g3kev

----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 8:51 PM
Subject: LF: Re: wspr more


Dear Mal, LF Group,


MOBMU now
192800 9 -13 0.2 -182 0 m0bmu 1091 30
Jim is this what u expect
mal/g3kev

Well, nearly - if the -182 is in the "DF" column, it would seem your RX is
set 182Hz too high.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.13/1915 - Release Date: 1/25/2009 6:13 PM



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>