To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 136kHz activity |
From: | Wolfgang Büscher <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:12:07 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <000701c95cc2$b330cb20$4201a8c0@home> |
References: | <000701c95cc2$b330cb20$4201a8c0@home> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) |
Jello Jim, Thanks again for the QSO .. you wrote: Yes, definitely. Being quite close to DCF39, these sidebands are really annoying. Markus DF6NM had to switch in a noise canceller to eliminate some of the QRM from his colour-direction finder. There is only one quite wide gap of the QRM-burst somewhere above 137.77 kHz - too far away from the inner-EU activity frequency.The QRN level was quite low, which was helpful - Is it just me, or are the sidebands from DCF39 stronger at the top edge of the band than they used to be? Cheers, Wolf . |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: DK4U's Hell, Wolfgang Büscher |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: DK4U's Hell, Andrey RN3AGC |
Previous by Thread: | LF: 136kHz activity, James Moritz |
Next by Thread: | LF: agc,xgj, victor13 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |