To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: 500 acty |
From: | John P-G <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:55:55 +0000 |
Cc: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <000701c9646c$cb6c7ca0$0b01a8c0@weazle> |
References: | <012b01c96466$d830ac00$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <000701c9646c$cb6c7ca0$0b01a8c0@weazle> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:37:50 -0000 "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]> wrote: > in Canada my licence allows me to operate an > "Amateur Experimental Station", and in my mind it's > that word in the middle which defines activity. Wow! You mean that in Canada a "real radio amateur" isn't required, by law, to spend all his spare time chasing DXCC, with a straight key and a homebrew transmitter? How enlightened your laws are, I wonder if the UK could ever have an amateur licence with the same conditions? Oh... hang on an minute.... |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: 500 acty, J. B. Weazle McCreath |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon, James Moritz |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: 500 acty, J. B. Weazle McCreath |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: 500 acty, mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |