| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Tick test |
| From: | Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:01:14 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.2) |
Stewart,an alternative to penalty points for wrong answers is increasing the minimum score required to succeed. Maybe they do that ? If not (thus 50% = passed) it besomes indeed a gambling game. 73, Rik Quoting Stewart Bryant <[email protected]>: Rik- there is a penalty for wrong answersUnfortunately not in the British RAE. Stewart/G3YSX Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: news or pictures please, Johan H. Bodin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Tick test, Graham |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Tick test, mal hamilton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Tick test, Ko Versteeg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |