Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Becons etc.

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Becons etc.
From: "mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 15:45:44 -0000
References: <002101c8b40f$0fe78780$0201a8c0@home>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hello Chris
Beacons can be useful the odd time but some are left on continuously for days. One weekend there was a chorous of beacons and some remained on for over a week just generating qrm.
GI3PDN, GI4DPE, GM4SLV, GW4HXO and a G3 in Norfolk, cannot remember his call. I cannot see the necessity for this when they are all capable of working a two way QSO on CW, then leaving the frequencies clear for others. I only work two way QSO mode and QSX on 3533/7033 khz for replies from those without a NOV for the band plus some EU dx.
I get lots of emails from others about beacons and some even advocate contacting OFCOM to have them stopped because of the QRM caused. I have not encouraged this approach, hoping that it will go away eventually.
I have a couple of large antennas for 500 and 137 khz and these pick up the weakest signals and although good in qso mode I get all the beacon qrm as well hi
73 for now and I hope you now see my point of view.
de Mal/G3KEV
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 9:03 AM
Subject: LF: Becons etc.

Hello Mal, G3KEV,
I don't have NOV for 500kHz but enjoy listening. Happy to discuss by e-mail direct.
I agree there is a problem with 'beacons'. Yesterdays long S9+ beacon signal was a nuisance to me, but I guess this was because the source was relatively close.
Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent.


Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.8/1413 - Release Date: 03/05/2008 11:22
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>