LF: RE: Re: CW Skimmer

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: RE: Re: CW Skimmer
From:	"John W Gould" <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:44:36 -0000
Importance:	Normal
In-reply-to:	<004101c86d61$bd443bc0$0301a8c0@g3kev>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
Thread-index:	AchtYu2R4ueD4OZBRiWh+FrYqsN/9gACL9uw

Mal, I agree with your comments.   It's an interesting development though.
Playing with the trial version it's amazing to watch it decode multiple CW
streams in a DX pileup in parallel and even when they are quite close in
terms of frequency.  

Not sure what it all means for HF operating, though.  

73 John, G3WKL

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: CW Skimmer, John W Gould LF: Re: CW Skimmer, mal LF: RE: Re: CW Skimmer, John W Gould <= Re: LF: CW Skimmer, Dick Rollema Re: LF: CW Skimmer, Mike Dennison Re: LF: CW Skimmer, John RABSON Re: LF: CW Skimmer, Graham Re: LF: CW Skimmer, Dave Sergeant Re: LF: CW Skimmer, John Pumford-Green GM4SLV Re: LF: CW Skimmer, Graham Re: LF: CW Skimmer, Steve Dove Re: LF: CW Skimmer, Fabian Kurz Faros (was Re: LF: CW Skimmer), K2ORS

Previous by Date:	LF: Re: CW Skimmer, mal
Next by Date:	Re: LF: CW Skimmer, Dick Rollema
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: CW Skimmer, mal
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: CW Skimmer, Dick Rollema
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]