To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 500 kHz in Belgium |
From: | Mike WE0H <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:18:17 -0600 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hGh96FMif0KM2efq/pkckBcNcA7oXAZGjE8gSA+yXNRxfcpxZDhCT8C7fq/KuzHJnfkjCZaxGNmXzgvkUEyUhAfKLsfCVKXBqI/NhfYEmeFDbcLhVb05AAxJpDHPbTZKxaMcr3LQLMB3PMgc/Wp641zr9a5gq6+PhtJvudemXgY= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) |
You guys should try to get 501-510kc and hopefully US can get down to 501kc rather than our 505kc we have now. Mike WE0H WD2XSH/16 Rik Strobbe wrote: BTW: together with the 500 kHz segment we got topband up to 2MHz (upper limit used to be 1875 kHz).73, Rik ON7YD At 08:19 16/01/2008, you wrote:On 15/01/2008 at 18:59 [email protected] wrote: >Shouldn't membership of the EU entitle us all to the same treatment? >But the EU is not the United States of Europe (yet!). And I recall a time when in the United States of America top band was not available in many areas.73 John F5VLF/G3PAIDisclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 500 kHz in Belgium, Rik Strobbe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: WX, Andrey RN3AGC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: 500 kHz in Belgium, Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 500 kHz in Belgium, Rik Strobbe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |