To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test |
From: | "Graham" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 4 Nov 2007 17:23:51 -0000 |
References: | <00bd01c81e2c$b6825c10$f7636a58@wgt01> <000701c81e48$e7e8ee60$14e4fc3e@g3kev> <[email protected]> <004301c81ed0$8c7ecc10$56ebfc3e@g3kev> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
.... you start to see the disenchantment caused by by the path of 'non linearity' , as steam gave way to sail , mark/space has given way to multiplex ..... G ..----- Original Message ----- From: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 10:49 AM Subject: Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test The appliance operators of today could not handle SPARK nor have they heardabout such things as crystal sets.You have obviously picked up an old comic !!!!!!!!!!!! or you are older thanyou think. Mal/G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Andrews" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 6:55 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test> All class A UK radio amateurs have passed the code test, so why botherwith> a mode that noone else bothers about. Better yet, use spark, so the chaps with crystal sets aren't excluded. John Andrews, W1TAG-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.19/1106 - Release Date: 11/2/2007 21:46 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: CLASS D and E, Andy Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test, hamilton mal |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 500 KHz test, John GM4SLV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |