Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Summary reports from typical urban station... |
| From: | "John W Gould" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:16:42 +0100 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| Importance: | Normal |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
I've had an extremely detailed reply (direct) from John, GM4SLV, that will greatly help me draft a decent paper for the Ofcom meeting. However, as John points out his experience is one that represents a station in a quiet radio location. To give a more balanced view it would be useful to have a report from one or two stations who can provide some examples of estimated (or measured) ERP levels, CW signal reports, RX and Aerial details from a typical urban location where the noise level is likely to be much higher and environmental factors possibly reduce the actual ERP in the far field. Direct e-mails might be best, to save clogging up the reflector, as you can then add some wav files, if you have them. 73 John, G3WKL RSGB HF Manager [email protected] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: RE: RE: 500 - QRP tests 14/8/07, John W Gould |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: 137.700, Willem de Roode |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: conditions 137KHz, Laurence KL1X |
| Next by Thread: | LF: 160, hamilton mal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |