LF: Re: Re: Re: GW beacons / GI4DPE

["Gw3UEP" <500kcs@uku.co.uk>]

Fantastic Jose - mni tks - that was late for me!

VFB, Rog.

----- Original Message -----

From: Jose Manuel

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 10:10 AM

Subject: LF: Re: Re: GW beacons / GI4DPE

Hello Rog and all,

 

Nice copy last night of your QSO with Finbar, both signals with similar level; in spite of QSB, almost 100% of the QSO heard here.

 

 

73 de José, EA1PX

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Gw3UEP

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:36 AM

Subject: LF: Re: GW beacons / GI4DPE

Fb Jim - hrd you wrkg Fin - wrkd him just b4 u, 599 here.

----- Original Message -----

From: James Moritz

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 2:20 AM

Subject: LF: GW beacons / GI4DPE

Dear LF Group,

 

I had  good reception of beacon signals from GW4HXO, GW3UEP and GI4DPE on Tuesday night / Wednesday morning - All the signals got up to a 569 sort of level at times, but with a lot of fading. When it started getting light, all 3 signals quickly faded into the noise. I have attached a snippet of the spectrogram showing the signals from GW4HXO (upper) and GI4DPE (lower) which illustrates the fading, with the time markers at 5 minute intervals. For some reason, the fading on GW4HXO's signal seems to be deeper than GI4DPE's, although both signals are peaking at a similar level.

 

I also had a good CW QSO with GI4DPE tonight starting about 2335utc; this had similar fading but never really disappeared completely, and was 569 most of the time for about 25 minutes. I am also hearing GW3UEP's beacon signal, which again seems to have much more fading than Finbar's signal did. 

 

Cheers, Jim Moritz

73 de M0BMU

__________ Información de NOD32, revisión 2424 (20070726) __________

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com