Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: GW beacons / GI4DPE

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Re: GW beacons / GI4DPE
From: "Jose Manuel" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:10:37 +0200
Delivered-to: [email protected]
References: <006901c7cfd4$8705a920$74c8e150@o> <002e01c7cfec$59c59160$05357ad5@w4o8m9> <001601c7d018$81122130$1265e150@o>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hello Rog and all,
 
Nice copy last night of your QSO with Finbar, both signals with similar level; in spite of QSB, almost 100% of the QSO heard here.
 
 
73 de José, EA1PX
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Gw3UEP
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:36 AM
Subject: LF: Re: GW beacons / GI4DPE

Fb Jim - hrd you wrkg Fin - wrkd him just b4 u, 599 here.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 2:20 AM
Subject: LF: GW beacons / GI4DPE

Dear LF Group,
 
I had  good reception of beacon signals from GW4HXO, GW3UEP and GI4DPE on Tuesday night / Wednesday morning - All the signals got up to a 569 sort of level at times, but with a lot of fading. When it started getting light, all 3 signals quickly faded into the noise. I have attached a snippet of the spectrogram showing the signals from GW4HXO (upper) and GI4DPE (lower) which illustrates the fading, with the time markers at 5 minute intervals. For some reason, the fading on GW4HXO's signal seems to be deeper than GI4DPE's, although both signals are peaking at a similar level.
 
I also had a good CW QSO with GI4DPE tonight starting about 2335utc; this had similar fading but never really disappeared completely, and was 569 most of the time for about 25 minutes. I am also hearing GW3UEP's beacon signal, which again seems to have much more fading than Finbar's signal did. 
 
Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU


__________ Información de NOD32, revisión 2424 (20070726) __________

Este mensaje ha sido analizado con NOD32 antivirus system
http://www.nod32.com
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>