To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Re: RE: G3YXM & G3WCB |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 14 Jul 2007 22:16:38 +0100 |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=niu+1uq8WHqvX7PvL2nqJlpWy3823m0GvG16VQvAAjf5QW8suHjdMJGGBvast27OUHhev5vE8LXgNMvrn8Flj9via+8TqQlBDTtBO5BtR27b3Pp6VUGOysMrWUwz3NQ9EFiLk445c4O1PGULKpKO8+xlSCfz92tyoj7eAXMBAAY= ; |
Domainkey-status: | bad (test mode) |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <[email protected]> <000d01c7c653$bd5dba10$2101a8c0@PCRoelof> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Mmmm I dont think so Roelof .......the IF filter should not make any difference unless you have in-band qrm. In fact a very narrow filter before an FFT can create artifacts which are not actually there sometimes. NDB mode uses a 12Hz resolution, effectively a 12Hz brick-wall filter with no phase problems. But there can be problems due to sample overlap, and the display protocol. Cheers de Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: Roelof Bakker <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: 14 July 2007 21:15 Subject: LF: Re: RE: G3YXM & G3WCB >> snip This demonstrates the benefits of using narrow audio filters. Best regards, Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: [500] Path to Shetland - G3WCB, Dave G3WCB |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: QRSS3 signals, Hartmut Wolff |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: RE: G3YXM & G3WCB, Roelof Bakker |
Next by Thread: | LF: capture ra3yo, henny van elst |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |