To: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: 503.40 CW CQ from Shetland |
From: | John GM4SLV <gm4slv@sighthound.demon.co.uk> |
Date: | Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:55:22 +0100 |
Delivered-to: | daveyxm@gmail.com |
In-reply-to: | <005d01c7cb83$aa54ffc0$51358351@w4o8m9> |
Organization: | The Gammy Bird |
References: | <20070721094356.714734a4@lurcher.twatt.local> <001b01c7cb79$6fa823c0$6eccfc3e@g3kev> <20070721104717.6307d729@lurcher.twatt.local> <005d01c7cb83$aa54ffc0$51358351@w4o8m9> |
Reply-to: | rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
Sender: | owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org |
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:41:15 +0100 "James Moritz" <james.moritz@btopenworld.com> wrote: > Dear John, > > Nil seen this morning - guess will have to wait until darkness. > > I tried putting the numbers into the late G4FGQ's Grndwav3 ground-wave > calculating software. Assuming about 660km G3KEV - GM4SLV, 100mW ERP > (=55mW EMRP)and a sea path the whole way virtually, the received > signal level should be about 0.7uV/m, which might be audible on a > quiet band. For inland stations, the ground wave losses increase a > lot, so some sort of ionospheric propagation probably will be > essential for a successful QSO. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > > > Hi Jim & LF Just completed the first G - GM QSO on 500kHz with Mal G3KEV His CW was RST 569 - solid signal His report to me was 339 so I TX'd in QRSS-3 - hand sent!! - and received a solid "O" report Roll on darkness! Cheers John |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: 136: Still alive !, James Moritz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: 503.40 CW CQ from Shetland, Gw3UEP |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: 503.40 CW CQ from Shetland, James Moritz |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: 503.40 CW CQ from Shetland, hamilton mal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |