To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Distance |
From: | Alan Ibbetson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 21 May 2007 23:43:02 +0100 |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <000701c79bce$99ad2ce0$72e4fc3e@g3kev> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Turnpike/6.04-S (<7JhEZ1+aE9U3ka1scEfXKvpP2j>) |
Hello Rik,In message <[email protected]>, Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> writes Why would one need an "antenna farm" with an ERP (EIRP ?) limit of 0.1 Watt? I think it's because small/low aerials lose more signal to surrounding ground clutter than do big/high aerials. I don't believe that trees, buildings and hills necessarily appear as part of the loss resistance you mention. On the other hand using narrowband modes will give easily give a 5 to 10 dB improvement of CW. Nobody disagrees with you. What Mal said was "there is no need to use QRS to be heard around EU". It seems a shame to use a slow mode if a given path supports a faster one. -- Cheers, Alan G3XAQ [email protected] |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Distance, Rik Strobbe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: T/A May, 19th, Joe Craig |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Distance, Rik Strobbe |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Distance, Rik Strobbe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |