To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Argo settings |
From: | John Andrews <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:05:01 -0400 |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <460BCC8F.11429.1742A6B@localhost> |
References: | <460BCC8F.11429.1742A6B@localhost> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) |
Mike, There are two issues that come quickly to mind:1. Use of a "faster" screen allows a wider frequency range over which signals can be seen. That is an issue with the N.A. window, where regular use has been made of 137.774 to 137.781 kHz. If one desires to capture all available signals, that may be an advantage. 2. The "Slow" option gives a cleaner looking screen than "Normal" or "Fast". QRSS60 signals look quite acceptable on a 30 second "Slow" screen. John A. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: T/A Mar, 28th/29th, Hartmut Wolff |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Argo settings, Alan Melia |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Argo settings, Mike Dennison |
Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Argo settings, Alan Melia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |