Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: UNID Signal

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: UNID Signal
From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:41:39 +0100
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=IpZDrIF4f9LE/7tAUp8ccj3jUuCErRvAGVbbHdW0WlMHfyKqNTI4ZSgJA1oIF7AQqvC3WYxlkZPmC8/xyYEbeU2SX3od7WijJfbkUoNV50lUm8PCO3sWw4Z7sedKDFMC1kfIdnIVYfTm64c7nkH0vZpygoIhLZB7HZ2uQaIo0Nk= ;
Domainkey-status: good (test mode)
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Ko well its a good sign anyway.....any more activity on 136 has got to be
a good thing. It was quite strong for EGO ....if its a Dutchman it was more
like Will's strength, but then maybe he would be S9 with you.

Cheers de Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message -----
From: Ko Versteeg <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: 17 October 2006 21:19
Subject: Re: LF: UNID Signal

>
> Gary & LF Group
> Around 20:00 the signal was at 137680, 20:30  he was on at 137770
> and around 21:05 he was near 137800.... 1 Hz lower ;-)
>
> Signal strength here was S7 so it could have been a PA3 station.
> It was not PA3CPM or PA3FNY, these guys are all much louder.
> It could have been PA3EGO setting op again.
>
> 73 de Ko, NL9222




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>