To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: UNID Signal |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:41:39 +0100 |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=IpZDrIF4f9LE/7tAUp8ccj3jUuCErRvAGVbbHdW0WlMHfyKqNTI4ZSgJA1oIF7AQqvC3WYxlkZPmC8/xyYEbeU2SX3od7WijJfbkUoNV50lUm8PCO3sWw4Z7sedKDFMC1kfIdnIVYfTm64c7nkH0vZpygoIhLZB7HZ2uQaIo0Nk= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (test mode) |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Ko well its a good sign anyway.....any more activity on 136 has got to be a good thing. It was quite strong for EGO ....if its a Dutchman it was more like Will's strength, but then maybe he would be S9 with you. Cheers de Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: Ko Versteeg <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: 17 October 2006 21:19 Subject: Re: LF: UNID Signal > > Gary & LF Group > Around 20:00 the signal was at 137680, 20:30 he was on at 137770 > and around 21:05 he was near 137800.... 1 Hz lower ;-) > > Signal strength here was S7 so it could have been a PA3 station. > It was not PA3CPM or PA3FNY, these guys are all much louder. > It could have been PA3EGO setting op again. > > 73 de Ko, NL9222 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: T/A Oct, 16th, Alan Melia |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: TEST, Wolf DL4YHF |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: UNID Signal, Gary - G4WGT |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: UNID Signal, Ko Versteeg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |