Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: T/A May 14

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: T/A May 14
From: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:01:20 +1200
Delivered-to: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Roelof
Can you be quite sure the feedline is not contributing to your received signal level? Any variation in strength with height would be a good indication that it is. Interesting to note your proposed use of the BFR96- have to say 2N5109s are not easy to find now. Is the BFR96 used in this instance from the SMD aspect and is there any performance degradation from this.
73
Dave
ZL3FJ


----- Original Message ----- From: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 5:38 AM
Subject: LF: T/A May 14


Hello all,

I have designed a new PCB for the mini-whip with SMD parts, except for the
2N5109.
The latter will be exchanged for a BFR96 in the near future.

Testdriving the new board last night, VO1NA and WD2XGJ were received quite
well.
Joe's signal peaked one hour before local sunrise.

A screenshot of WD2XGJ is in the next e-mail

It is amazing to realise that these signals were received on a square inch
of copperclad PCB. The complete board measures 22 x 60 mm.

Best regards,

Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/339 - Release Date: 14/05/2006


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/339 - Release Date: 14/05/2006



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>