Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: Re: T/A May 14

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: Re: T/A May 14
From: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 22:16:14 +1200
Delivered-to: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Disregard the comment about signal strength variation with height, Roelof - I must have had a bad night last night! Of course it will vary with height, regardless of feedline issues - silly me!
Interested to hear about the BFR96 though.

Surprised no one jumped on me about the height thing - you lot must all be asleep - or maybe just waking up!! (except ZL4OL)
73
Dave, ZL3FJ


----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Brown" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 9:01 AM
Subject: LF: Re: T/A May 14


Hi Roelof
Can you be quite sure the feedline is not contributing to your received signal level? Any variation in strength with height would be a good indication that it is. Interesting to note your proposed use of the BFR96- have to say 2N5109s are not easy to find now. Is the BFR96 used in this instance from the SMD aspect and is there any performance degradation from this.
73
Dave
ZL3FJ


----- Original Message ----- From: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 5:38 AM
Subject: LF: T/A May 14


Hello all,

I have designed a new PCB for the mini-whip with SMD parts, except for the
2N5109.
The latter will be exchanged for a BFR96 in the near future.
sniptherest************

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/339 - Release Date: 14/05/2006



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>