Alan, John, and J.B.
Thanks for the comments on the pros and cons of Argo, Spectran and Spectrum
Lab.
--
73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ
FN42hi
http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" <[email protected]>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ" <[email protected]>
> To: "rsgb lf reflector" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "LWCA LF Reflector" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 2:59 PM
> Subject: LF: ARGO or SPECTRAN?
>
>
> > Hello the list,
> >
> > I have been using Spectran for my QRSS receiving, mostly out of habit.
>
> <SNIP>
>
> > Am I missing something by using Spectran instead of Argo?
> >
> > 73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ
> > FN42hi
> > http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm
> >
>
> Hi Warren,
>
> Since all I can do so far is receive, I thought I'd throw my 2 cents worth
> in on this. I use both Argo and Spectrum Lab for my QRSS listening,
> and I like both of them. Argo shines in its simplicity to configure and in
> the ease of use, once you've loaded a few favourite settings into it. Not
> having a lot of fancy bells and whistles means it's pretty hard to mess up
> anything. Spectrum Lab does have one ability that I really like in that I
> can change the range of frequency that I want to watch without having
> an effect on the mode. For instance I can set an upper and lower pair
> of frequencies to establish a range while watching QRSS30, then make
> a change to that range on the fly without other effects. I find that one
> feature quite handy. As one of the others on the list mentioned, it all
> boils down to which one you're comfortable with and how it does
> what you want of it.
>
> 73, J.B., VE3EAR - VE3WZL
> Solar and wind powered
> EN93dr
>
>
>
|
