Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: T/A JAN 31

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: T/A JAN 31
From: Wolf DL4YHF <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:58:35 +0000
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:59:03 +0000
Envelope-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <002101c6264f$35250bd0$2201a8c0@pcroelof>
References: <003301c6263d$8c89cee0$0100a8c0@jpmpcportable> <002101c6264f$35250bd0$2201a8c0@pcroelof>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
Hi Roelof,

Neither ARGO nor SpecLab nor any other FFT-based spectrum display software needs noise. Without AGC, the colour of a pixel in the waterfall only depends on the strenght of the carrier (except of course for the radio-direction finder mode, which you see on DF6NM's grabber). Things may are a bit more complicated if you have an AGC (which may cause the colour to get weaker in the presence of strong noise, even if the strength of the "wanted" signal remains the same).

Best regards,
 Wolf .



Roelof Bakker schrieb:

Hello all,

Last night I tried ARGO.
The band started very noisy, but I got captures of WD2XKO and WD2XGJ.
VO1NA appeared later.

I have heard rumours that ARGO and SpecLab need some background noise to compare the signals against and hence should work better with a (relative) wider bandwidth. At present, I am using a 12 Hz bandwidth and both programs seem to work fine.
Can anyone shed some light on this?

Thank you in advance,

Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt
------------------------------------------------------------------------




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>