LF: T/A JAN 31

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: T/A JAN 31
From:	"Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:15:05 +0100
Delivery-date:	Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:16:43 +0000
Envelope-to:	[email protected]
References:	<003301c6263d$8c89cee0$0100a8c0@jpmpcportable>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hello all,

Last night I tried ARGO.
The band started very noisy, but I got captures of WD2XKO and WD2XGJ.
VO1NA appeared later.

I have heard rumours that ARGO and SpecLab need some background noise tocompare the signals against and hence should work better with a (relative)wider bandwidth.At present, I am using a 12 Hz bandwidth and both programs seem to workfine.

Can anyone shed some light on this?

Thank you in advance,

Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: TA: VO1NA, (continued) LF: TA: VO1NA, Jean-Pierre Godet LF: TA, Jay Rusgrove LF: Re: TA, Alan Melia LF: Re: Re: TA, Jay Rusgrove LF: TA [1], Jean-Pierre Méré LF: TA [1], Jean-Pierre Méré LF: RE: TA - HA6PX Grabber, Dave G3WCB LF: TA, Jean-Pierre Méré LF: Re: TA, Roelof Bakker LF: Re: Re: TA, Jean-Pierre Méré LF: T/A JAN 31, Roelof Bakker <= LF: Re: T/A JAN 31, Alan Melia LF: Re: T/A JAN 31, dj9dw LF: Re: Bandwidth - was T/A JAN 31, Hartmut Wolff Re: LF: T/A JAN 31, Alberto di Bene Re: LF: T/A JAN 31, Wolf DL4YHF LF: Re: T/A JAN 31, Roelof Bakker

Previous by Date:	LF: Re: TA, Roelof Bakker
Next by Date:	LF: Re: Re: TA, Jean-Pierre Méré
Previous by Thread:	LF: Re: Re: TA, Jean-Pierre Méré
Next by Thread:	LF: Re: T/A JAN 31, Alan Melia
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]