To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Advice (again) please |
From: | brian hodgson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 3 Oct 2005 19:14:17 +0100 (BST) |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 03 Oct 2005 19:14:36 +0100 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LGDcqHg1691TWJygSRA6iw8TMIBofPMjCpSaxJ0EMkLKb6qtOzTiQxGvI0XsQd9j9YVLMj2SM5lCb9DyfMDVBZ9Ywt86D3165Ac1ZW34DlnnKAe6R6Vl+U9WWRf8Pq36hlb33TS7rKK+vcgdy3Jx1JhD+WaFG2q3fXzcb7S4ong= ; |
Envelope-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <B333AB0EF6D4D4118BAF00508BAED8EA088DA7BD@mms12014.stv.uk.astrium.corp> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Chris -
I've been dabbling with some PA circuits recently - the usual hard switching, push-pull fets and transformer output follwed by a pi (C-L-C) Lowpass filter.
One trick I did discover was that by increasing the inductance of the low pass filter (using the tried and tested technique of poking a large ferrite rod inside the coil) from 120 to 185 microhenries the voltage waveform on the drains became a lot smoother - more like class E - and the overall efficiency went up to better than 90% (over 200 watts out for 220 watts input).
Adjustment was quite sharp but not "critical". Watching the drain waveform voltage on the scope was the best way to tweak but just tuning for minimum supply current seemed almost as good.
Brian
"OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]> wrote: I'm generating 100 watts into my 50 ohm dummy load but
Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | AW: LF: ????, Thomas Eckart |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Re: ZM2E LF DX aspirations, Vernall |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Advice (again) please, OSBORN, Chris |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Advice (again) please, Alan Melia |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |