Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: 135.92 warning

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 135.92 warning
From: "Scott Tilley, VE7TIL" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 07:34:44 -0700
Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:35:13 +0100
Envelope-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <001a01c5c9b7$80430080$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL>
References: <001401c5c9b1$4ebe0ec0$8d01a8c0@JKA> <001a01c5c9b7$80430080$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1-cvs
Hey Jay

Care should be taken when measuring the strenght of that CA station... From time to time it stops modulation for seemingly random periods of time and may idle on either carrier freq, which one? seems random to me... I include three plots on my Spec Lab plot to detect this. Two are measuring the peak in a narrow BW around each carrier. The third is measuring the average signal strenght of the 50Hz BW signal (maybe abit more I can't remember as the plotter is at home...) I also look at a spot about 100Hz above and below for the noise floor measurement of anything less and the noise floor varies with its signal strenght... This seems like a good setup for monitoring from here...

I find the signal is at our noise floor during the day (s0-s1) and peaks at night at over +30db over S9 on my rig.
I've noted correlations between flares and its signal strenght as well...

Back to trying to work that pesky ZL...

73 Scott



Quoting Jay Rusgrove <[email protected]>:

John & the group

Interesting you should mention this. I've been plotting NPG the past couple
weeks ala W3EEE DCF39 style graph. The signal is quite strong typically
showing up at 0100Z and fading out an hour or so after local sunrise. The
signal is strong enough that the frequencies between .925 and .975 become
filled with 'white' on an Argo screen. In order to get to a truly clean noise
floor for the noise channel measurement it was necessary to move at least 25
kHz outside the carriers.

 An early sample before timing issues were sorted out is here:
http://www.advancedreceiver.com/capture/NPG1.jpg

Had been planning to make this into a 'permanent' upload for propagation
study in the next week or so...if there is any interest.
A contact at DOD verified it as Dixon CA running 40 kW.

Jay ----- Original Message ----- From: John Andrews To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 9:32 AM
  Subject: LF: 135.92 warning


  The area around 135.922 kHz has been used for Europe to North America
  transmission for several years. In May of 2005, a military TTY station in
  California started using that part of the band. Following a tip from
  Laurence last night, I noticed that the signal is quite loud in the
eastern
  U.S., and was clearly audible an hour after sunrise this morning.

  They are using 50 Hz shift, with carriers on 135.925 and 135.975 kHz. I
  don't know what the keying rate is, but the signal is appropriately wide.

  Any of you planning transmissions to North America should consider moving
  above 136 kHz if this operation continues. Since the east coast is subject
  to interference from CFH on 137.00 kHz (+/- a few hundred Hz), there may
be
  an upper bound. Mercifully, the CFH operation is intermittent, and they
have
  been quiet since mid-summer. With a number of U.S. and Canadian beacon
  stations running 24/7 in the 137.777 kHz range, it would also be advisable
  to stay below 137.5 kHz.

  John Andrews, W1TAG/WD2XES










<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>