Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Fw: TM0AST

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Fw: TM0AST
From: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:08:12 +0100
Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:16:16 +0100
Envelope-to: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michel F5WK" <[email protected] >
To: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Fw: TM0AST

Le lundi 20 juin 2005 à 18:08:34, [email protected] a écrit:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From:hamilton mal
> To:[email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 8:08 PM
> Subject: TM0AST

> Hi All
> The callsign that I read was TM0AST and not TM5AST.  Which is correct ??
> de G3KEV

 In the hurry, I forgot to check out the call sign in the QRS buffer. The
 good callsign is TM5AST. It's been corrected just after the beginning of
 the qso with Jim. Sorry about that.

 73 de Michel f5wk
The Bat
Tnx Michel for the info. It looks like I am the only one that read the
callsign as sent. There is too much guesswork on LF and some claiming QSO'S
in the past because they saw a mark on the frequency but got no proper ID.
You were a very strong signal with me on both my loop and vertical. I did
not have time for a QSO but maybe next time.
73 de Mal/G3KEV

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>