Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: reception with multiple antennas

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: reception with multiple antennas
From: Wolf DL4YHF <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 19:52:43 +0200
Delivery-date: Tue, 24 May 2005 18:52:25 +0100
Envelope-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <003001c5603e$24e42ee0$1101a8c0@w2ksn>
References: <003001c5603e$24e42ee0$1101a8c0@w2ksn>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
Hi Stewart,

An impressive idea - sounds a bit like radio astronomy on LF, using an interferometer !

One problem I see for a practical implementation is the internet connection - last not least because on some quiet "remote" sites there is no internet at all, or only through a slow modem connection. I played with the windows socket services some time ago, trying to get a reliable audio link in "almost real time" running, but got entangled in red tape... it may be simpler these days, but I honestly haven't got a clue yet. For a start, we either try to exchange the audio samples as simple decimated audio files (via manual or automated cyclic FTP, etc), or find someone with in-depth experience in WAN / internet programming. Another, possibly simpler "local" approach which would not rely on the internet, is using cheap FM links to combine signals received from various receiving sites separated a few dozen kilometers from each other, and use a PC / soundcard with multiple inputs. This would allow almost-real-time reception, good for two-way CW attempts ;-)

For the test recordings, which file format would you prefer ... bandwidth / sampling rate, complex or real sample pairs, etc ? I wanted to add a decimated audio logging feature in the WOLF GUI, possibly using the JASON file format (which is supported by at least two other programs already), or something in that style. The next chance to make a few recordings would be on Thursday evening, or next weekend, though the "QRN forecast" doesn't look very promising.

73,
Wolf  DL4YHF .









<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>